Friday, 11 September 2009

That's All Folks!

As with Bugs Bunny so it is with the ever shortening athletics season. For the general public Athletics 2009 has been about nine, pulsating days in Berlin and Usain Bolt; for aficionados it’s been around nine weeks. But now it’s all over and it’s time to lower the curtains. It is not finis, of course, if you live in the southern hemisphere, where the season is just starting. Not so you’d notice in the northern half of the globe because news from the south is minimal.

When the IAAF launched its new Diamond League in March its President, Lamine Diack said: “It has always been one of our dreams to see the circuit of our best meetings going to each corner of the world. And today, we are all sitting here and are proud to say that the dream has come true.” Well, not quite.

Of the fifteen selected meetings eleven are in Europe, two are in the USA and one each in Asia and the Arabian Peninsula. By not travelling south of the equator great cities like Sydney (2000 Olympics); Melbourne (2006 Commonwealth); Rio de Janeiro (bidding for 2016 Olympics); Auckland (1990 Commonwealth Games); Johannesburg (1998 World Athletics Cup); Cape Town (2010 FIFA World Cup); Jakarta (2011 South-East Asia Games) will not see the world’s very best athletes in action.

How can this be? How is it that other sports like rugby, cricket, golf, tennis, soccer, play at a high level for nine or more months of the year, taking their competitions to southern climes when it is out-of-season in the north (or vice-versa) whilst athletics, apart from some cross-country and indoor, goes into training hibernation after more like nine weeks?

It’s partly habit, of course, the old “well, we’ve always done it this way” beloved of so many in athletics including, regrettably, many coaches. Little research has been carried out on the comparative physiological requirements of different sports but I find it difficult to believe that they are so much greater in track and field than they are in, say, tennis, where the best players, for nine months or so, can play upwards of fifteen hours competitive tennis in a week between flying to venues around the globe. And still train.

Anyway, many athletes run week-in, week-out arduous cross-country races and sprinters and jumpers compete in indoor meetings; athletes of undoubted talent from Australia and New Zealand in particular have always travelled northwards in search of fame and fortune after their summer seasons.

John Landy did it in the fifties as did Herb Elliott, Ron Clarke and Murray Halberg in the following decade. The late Andy Norman persuaded the New Zealanders John Walker, Rod Dixon and Dick Quax to come to Europe every year for the summer season with no detrimental effect on their performances. Most of the above set world records in the northern hemisphere. More recently Craig Mottram ran the Europe circuit for a number of seasons. So it appears that talented southern hemisphere athletes can endure up to eight months of combined competing and training without harmful effects on performance. It surely follows that European and American athletes can do likewise.

To truly reach, with the Diamond League, “each corner of the globe” as Diack put it, the IAAF has to do one of two things. It either has to extend the programme by another six meetings or so or it has to cut down on the number of European meetings on the circuit. Given the close ties between the European promoters and the world governing body this might prove difficult. Some of the proposed meetings have a long history with the Weltklasse at the Leitzegrund track in Zurich, for instance, going back over 80 years.

But if we are to embrace what the IAAF calls “the athletics family” south of the equator, if we are to help develop the sport in that vast area, then tough decision will have to be taken.

The IAAF is to be congratulated on its concept which is certainly more equitable in terms of the distribution of events and of prize money but its success will be governed by the television coverage that it can attract. The whole series needs to be aired ideally on terrestrial television but at least on mainstream satellite and certainly not tucked away on obscure pay-to-view channels in various countries. Without television world-wide the Diamond League will be just another self-indulgent exercise by a sport that needs to frequently convince itself that it is more important than it really is.

A Pretence of Democracy

Steve Backley, one of the world’s all-time great javelin throwers, is the interim vice-president of the UK Members Council a body that meets twice annually to sustain the pretence that democracy reigns in our sport in Britain.

He now has to go through an election process to confirm his original appointment. Knowing Steve as I do then, should there be such an election process (doubtful as you will see), it is more than likely that he would get my vote being perfectly capable of expressing robust views where necessary.

It is the process of this election that should give grave concern to the vast majority of the sport. It is a similar procedure as is operated by England Athletics where recently, some may remember, a challenger to the incumbent chairman was rejected by an Establishment vetting panel appointed to assess candidature suitability.

A similar all-white, all-male athletics establishment junta has been set up to decide whether suggested candidates can become nominations to challenge Steve. Whilst not suggesting that the vetting panel has anything but fairness and the good of the sport at heart it is surely right to point out that the process is open to abuse and manipulation. It is also a process (no doubt instigated by our unelected sporting quangos)that looks so daunting that very few would seemingly wish to undertake it which is probably the whole purpose of the exercise.

What is extraordinary is the submissiveness of the rank and field of British athletics to the processes that have over the past twelve years eroded its ability to influence the development of the sport. Typical of the docility has been the total lack of protest and even comment on the administrative changes made by England leading to the abolition of the nine regional offices and as a consequence the demotion of the nine regional councils to talking shops. The auguries for the replacements are not propitious but all this has been greeted by a deafening silence.

“To stand in silence,” said Abraham Lincoln, “when they should be protesting makes cowards out of men.”


Zac said...


Sometimes it is more important to establish new structures and ensure they are robust before announcing to the world that things need to change.

The quango system is unsustainable financially. They are seeking to use the voluntary sector to deliver sport into schools on the cheap. To implement this idea they are imposing such bureaucracy on clubs and volunteers that it is failing and will continue to fail.

However the need and desire for sport is ongoing, so we must concentrate on recognising the mistakes of the past and correcting them.

That is happening, and when the government, BBC, Aviva, McCain etc support ends, as it will, the clubs will be better organised to ensure that children and adults of all abilities and colours have the opportunity to compete on a level playing field.

Forgive me for reminding you that in the mid 90's when you were participating in the governance of the sport, I wrote to you outlining the potential of the Internet as a communication tool. You did not show much interest.

Predicting the future is difficult. Possibly it is better to just get on with it, and create the future that you desire and then wait to see who wants to come and play by the new rules.

I hope your club has joined the Directory of Clubs at the website, and will participate by using the transparent and democratic tools as they evolve.

john bicourt said...


You're obviously not following the sport as closely as you think.

Your belief that the sport has shown a "total lack of protest and even comment" is way off the mark.

Why do you think the Association of British Athletics Clubs (ABAC) was formed? What do you think they have been trying to do over the last four-five years since the sham of the Foster Review was foisted onto the sport?

Docility and apathy may be the chosen position of a majority, as in national politics, but ABAC and others have consistently voiced and published their concerns. They have met variously with the stakeholder, UK Sport and the governing bodies, UKA and EA over issues of governance, lack of democracy, funding, grass roots development, coaching and long term strategy.

But with no shareholder stake and voting rights by the clubs, as was the case under the high jacked AAA's, UKA Ltd., could and does do exactly as it pleases with no accountability. ABAC have, nevertheless, effected some changes with regard to insurance and the attempted effort by the administration to impose a membership scheme. Some of us were also influential in the eventual removal of the senior management of UKA by bringing notice and criticism to government level.

You are also forgetting the very significant 'egg in the face' for this unelected administration, when they lost the massive Road Runners sector of the sport who went off and formed and aligned themselves to their own Association of Running Clubs (ARC) once they realised the government’s imposed sport's administration was purely interested in the potential income from the many hundreds of thousands who make up the running fraternity, yet with no equitable return in benefit for the running clubs themselves..... and ARC was an offshoot from ABAC

You also forget those, including journalists and former members of the government, who have produced reports and articles criticising and questioning the waste of public money in trying to grow a tree from the top down!

And so back to the proposed UKA's new, Vice President: Steve Backley will undoubtedly be "voted" in. He's a name but he'll have no vote on any decision and no power, as Mike Winch his predecessor found to his frustration which eventually caused him to resign!

The President and Vice President’s unpaid roles are meant to be the "moral authority of the sport" to represent the sport and to ensure that the administration does the right thing. But in reality they're just well known powerless figureheads to shake hands with government officials and dignitaries and carry the pretence of democracy within the sport. Aristotle would, no doubt, have approved!

Martin Bingisser said...

Great post. Another shortfall of the Diamond League: it has every event but the hammer throw. I talk about that aspect in this post:

Anonymous said...

Excellent goods from you, man. I've understand your stuff previous to and you're just too magnificent.

I really like what you have acquired here, certainly like what you are saying and the way in
which you say it. You make it enjoyable and you still take care of to keep
it smart. I cant wait to read far more from you.

This is really a wonderful web site.

Also visit my webpage; workouts To increase vertical leap

Anonymous said...

Heya i'm for the primary time here. I found this board and I find It truly useful & it helped me out much. I'm
hoping to give one thing again and help others such as you helped me.

My weblog workouts to Increase vertical

Anonymous said...

Touche. Solid arguments. Keep up the great spirit.

Also visit my web blog:

Anonymous said...

Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wished to say that I have really enjoyed browsing your blog posts.
In any case I will be subscribing to your feed and I hope you
write again very soon!

my homepage; exercises to increase vertical

Anonymous said...

You really make it seem really easy together with your presentation however I find this topic to be actually something which I feel I'd never understand. It kind of feels too complicated and very vast for me. I am taking a look forward for your next put up, I will try to get the grasp of it!

Here is my page; how to dunk

Anonymous said...

This post is worth everyone's attention. How can I find out more?

Look at my web page - vertical jump exercises

Anonymous said...

Thanks , I've recently been searching for information approximately this subject for a long time and yours is the greatest I have discovered so far. However, what concerning the bottom line? Are you sure in regards to the supply?

Here is my homepage :: Workouts To Jump Higher

Anonymous said...

Asking questions are really pleasant thing if you are not
understanding anything totally, except this post offers
pleasant understanding yet.

my web page ... vertical leap workouts

Anonymous said...

Useful information. Fortunate me I discovered your web site by chance, and I'm surprised why this accident didn't happened in advance!
I bookmarked it.

Also visit my webpage - workouts to increase vertical jump